insurgent49
  updated weekly
home - submissions - donatemessage board links - contact us - archive
April 24, 2007
The Bramble Bush
by Kevin Morford, insurgent49

Real ID, Real Fascism

     There is an ongoing struggle taking place between the forces of freedom and the forces of fascism. No, I’m not talking about the oxymoronic war against terrorism. I am talking about the efforts of U.S. fascists to eliminate rights that have helped protect freedom in this country ever since it was founded.

     Fascist is a strong term to throw around, so a little explanation may be in order. The key features of fascism are a powerful central government, disregard of human rights at home and abroad, governmental support of favored capitalists, and an aggressive use of military force against other countries.

     These are exactly the policies that are favored by the fascists in the U.S., including those in the Bush administration. The war on terrorism has primarily served as an excuse to implement these policies, which are directly related to the plutocratic agenda that I wrote about last week.

     Since the war on terrorism was announced, we have seen a large increase in the power of the U.S. government to do whatever it wants to do. Human rights have been trampled underfoot, both here and around the world. Hundreds of billions of dollars have been diverted into no bid contracts, while the corporations have been allowed to re-write the laws and regulations that affect them. The aggressive use of military force by our government needs no explanation.

     But the fascists are not done yet. One of the next steps they are trying to impose is the implementation of the Real ID Act. I previously wrote here about the possible use of internal passports to control the U.S. population. I didn’t think that the Bush administration would actually implement such a program, because it would be too unpopular with the voters. Now that Bush is already unpopular, there is apparently no longer any reason for him to hold back. The Real ID Act is a huge step in that direction.

     The Real ID Act, which has already been enacted into law, establishes a national identity card for all persons in the United State. There are many reasons to be concerned about this statute. It will cost billions of dollars to implement. It will increase the risk of identity theft. It will also do little to prevent terrorism.

     What it will do is to enable the government to more easily keep track of what law-abiding citizens are doing in their private affairs. This of course is the real goal of the Real ID Act. The biggest threat to the fascists is not terrorists, but rather law-abiding citizens who want to keep their freedoms, and will fight for them.

     There is a struggle going on over the Real ID Act. Sincere people from all parts of the political spectrum are mobilizing to reject that unfunded federal mandate. In both Idaho and Maine, laws have been enacted which reject the Real ID Act. Similar measures have been introduced in at least 21 other states and in some jurisdictions such a measure has already passed one branch of the legislature.

     As far as I am aware no similar measure has been introduced in Alaska to date, but there is reason to be hopeful that it may happen. Alaska was in the vanguard in passing a resolution against the Patriot Act. Parallel concerns about the Real ID Act may bring a similar result, but only if Alaskans demand it.

     Many Alaskans came to this state in search of the greater personal autonomy that exists here. They might be anywhere on the political spectrum, but they cherish their freedom from governmental control over their personal lives. If we work together, we can make Alaska a Real ID free zone.






      Kevin Morford is a political activist and an attorney in private practice in the Anchorage area.  He can be reached at kmorford@insurgent49.com.

     'The Bramble Bush. appears on insurgent49.com every Tuesday.

- Columnists -

Editor's Desk
by Aaron Selbig

Rank and File
by Nova Stubbs

Red Alert
by Soren Wuerth



Alaskan In Exile
by Neil Zawicki

The
Bramble Bush
by Kevin Morford


The Tao

of Waitressing
by Lindsay Luckey








- column archive -

April 17, 2007

April 10, 2007

April 3, 2007

March 27, 2007

March 20, 2007

March 13, 2007

March 6, 2007

February 27, 2007

February 20, 2007

February 13, 2007

February 6, 2007

January 30, 2007

January 23, 2007

January 16, 2007

January 9, 2007

January 2, 2007

December 26, 2006

December 19, 2006

December 12, 2006

December 5, 2006

November 28, 2006

November 22, 2006

November 10, 2006

November 3, 2006

October 27, 2006

October 20, 2006

October 13, 2006

October 6, 2006

September 29, 2006

September 22, 2006

September 15, 2006

September 8, 2006

September 1, 2006

August 25, 2006

August 18, 2006

August 11, 2006

August 4, 2006

July 28, 2006

July 21, 2006

July 14, 2006

June 30, 2006

June 23, 2006

June 16, 2006

June 9, 2006

June 2, 2006

May 26, 2006

May 12, 2006

May 5, 2006

April 28, 2006

April 21, 2006

April 14, 2006

April 7, 2006

March 31, 2006

March 24, 2006

March 17, 2006

March 3, 2006

February 24, 2006

February 17, 2006

February 10, 2006

February 3, 2006

January 27, 2006

January 20, 2006

January 13, 2006

January 6, 2006

December 30, 2005

December 23, 2005

December 16, 2005

December 10, 2005

December 2, 2005

November 25, 2005

November 18, 2005

November 11, 2005

November 4, 2005

October 28, 2005

October 21, 2005

October 14, 2005

October 7, 2005

September 30, 2005

September 23, 2005

September 16, 2005

September 9, 2005

September 2, 2005

August 26, 2005

August 19, 2005

August 12, 2005

August 5, 2005

July 29, 2005

July 22, 2005

July 15, 2005

July 8, 2005

July 1, 2005



- also by this writer -

Borrow And Spend Republicans

Judicial Independence

Special Interest Trade Agreements

Knee Jerks

Unsure Insurance

Flat Tax Folly

Law and Disorder


Spies Among Us

Why Tort Reform Is Bad For The Economy



Copyright 2005-2007 Insurgent Media Alaska. All Rights Reserved.
in-sur-gent (in sur'jent), n. 1. a member of a group which revolts against the policies of its leadership.