| updated weekly |
home - submissions - donate - message board - links - contact us - archive |
| April 24, 2007 The Bramble Bush by Kevin Morford, insurgent49 Real ID, Real Fascism
There is an ongoing struggle taking place between the forces of freedom and the forces of fascism. No, I’m not talking about the oxymoronic war against terrorism. I am talking about the efforts of U.S. fascists to eliminate rights that have helped protect freedom in this country ever since it was founded. Fascist is a strong term to throw around, so a little explanation may be in order. The key features of fascism are a powerful central government, disregard of human rights at home and abroad, governmental support of favored capitalists, and an aggressive use of military force against other countries. These are exactly the policies that are favored by the fascists in the U.S., including those in the Bush administration. The war on terrorism has primarily served as an excuse to implement these policies, which are directly related to the plutocratic agenda that I wrote about last week. Since the war on terrorism was announced, we have seen a large increase in the power of the U.S. government to do whatever it wants to do. Human rights have been trampled underfoot, both here and around the world. Hundreds of billions of dollars have been diverted into no bid contracts, while the corporations have been allowed to re-write the laws and regulations that affect them. The aggressive use of military force by our government needs no explanation. But the fascists are not done yet. One of the next steps they are trying to impose is the implementation of the Real ID Act. I previously wrote here about the possible use of internal passports to control the U.S. population. I didn’t think that the Bush administration would actually implement such a program, because it would be too unpopular with the voters. Now that Bush is already unpopular, there is apparently no longer any reason for him to hold back. The Real ID Act is a huge step in that direction. The Real ID Act, which has already been enacted into law, establishes a national identity card for all persons in the United State. There are many reasons to be concerned about this statute. It will cost billions of dollars to implement. It will increase the risk of identity theft. It will also do little to prevent terrorism. What it will do is to enable the government to more easily keep track of what law-abiding citizens are doing in their private affairs. This of course is the real goal of the Real ID Act. The biggest threat to the fascists is not terrorists, but rather law-abiding citizens who want to keep their freedoms, and will fight for them. There is a struggle going on over the Real ID Act. Sincere people from all parts of the political spectrum are mobilizing to reject that unfunded federal mandate. In both Idaho and Maine, laws have been enacted which reject the Real ID Act. Similar measures have been introduced in at least 21 other states and in some jurisdictions such a measure has already passed one branch of the legislature. As far as I am aware no similar measure has been introduced in Alaska to date, but there is reason to be hopeful that it may happen. Alaska was in the vanguard in passing a resolution against the Patriot Act. Parallel concerns about the Real ID Act may bring a similar result, but only if Alaskans demand it. Many Alaskans came to this state in search of the greater personal autonomy that exists here. They might be anywhere on the political spectrum, but they cherish their freedom from governmental control over their personal lives. If we work together, we can make Alaska a Real ID free zone. Kevin Morford is a political activist and an attorney in private practice in the Anchorage area. He can be reached at kmorford@insurgent49.com. 'The Bramble Bush. appears on insurgent49.com every Tuesday. |
-
Columnists -
- column archive -
April 17, 2007 April 10, 2007 April 3, 2007 March 27, 2007 March 20, 2007 March 13, 2007 March 6, 2007 February 27, 2007 February 20, 2007 February 13, 2007 February 6, 2007 January 30, 2007 January 23, 2007 January 16, 2007 January 9, 2007 January 2, 2007 December 26, 2006 December 19, 2006 December 12, 2006 December 5, 2006 November 28, 2006 November 22, 2006 November 10, 2006 November 3, 2006 October 27, 2006 October 20, 2006 October 13, 2006 October 6, 2006 September 29, 2006 September 22, 2006 September 15, 2006 September 8, 2006 September 1, 2006 August 25, 2006 August 18, 2006 August 11, 2006 August 4, 2006 July 28, 2006 July 21, 2006 July 14, 2006 June 30, 2006 June 23, 2006 June 16, 2006 June 9, 2006 June 2, 2006 May 26, 2006 May 12, 2006 May 5, 2006 April 28, 2006 April 21, 2006 April 14, 2006 April 7, 2006 March 31, 2006 March 24, 2006 March 17, 2006 March 3, 2006 February 24, 2006 February 17, 2006 February 10, 2006 February 3, 2006 January 27, 2006 January 20, 2006 January 13, 2006 January 6, 2006 December 30, 2005 December 23, 2005 December 16, 2005 December 10, 2005 December 2, 2005 November 25, 2005 November 18, 2005 November 11, 2005 November 4, 2005 October 28, 2005 October 21, 2005 October 14, 2005 October 7, 2005 September 30, 2005 September 23, 2005 September 16, 2005 September 9, 2005 September 2, 2005 August 26, 2005 August 19, 2005 August 12, 2005 August 5, 2005 July 29, 2005 July 22, 2005 July 15, 2005 July 8, 2005 July 1, 2005 - also by this writer - Borrow And Spend Republicans Judicial Independence Special Interest Trade Agreements Knee Jerks Unsure Insurance Flat Tax Folly Law and Disorder Spies Among Us Why Tort Reform Is Bad For The Economy |
||||||||
| Copyright
2005-2007
Insurgent Media Alaska. All Rights
Reserved. in-sur-gent (in sur'jent), n. 1. a member of a group which revolts against the policies of its leadership. |
|||||||||