| updated weekly |
home - submissions - donate - message board - events - links - contact us - archive |
| November 3, 2006 The Bramble Bush by Kevin Morford Super Natural Abilities
Last week, I wrote about a carnival ride I took on the Octopus. I was spared from serious injury or death because, during the ride, I suddenly became concerned about the possibility that the door would fly open and pull me out of the car. Mid-ride, I transferred my grip from the rail on the door to the rail along the seat back. When the door of my car suddenly slammed open, I stayed safely inside. You can read the full details here. I have shared this story with a number of people over the years, and some seem to believe it is an example of prescience, or supernatural knowledge of the future. Others dismiss it as coincidence. I don’t think either interpretation is correct. It is fun to believe that we are gifted with supernatural talents. It makes us feel special, and gives our egos a little boost. Pretending to have these types of abilities is part of what makes Halloween such a popular holiday. But wishful thinking and the desire to feel good about ourselves do not make something true. It would also be fun to be able to fly without mechanical assistance. Experience in the real world has already convinced most people that unaided flying is not one of their abilities. An idea is not very useful if it deceives you into believing or doing something that can harm you. While prescience is one possible explanation for my sudden concern about the door flying open, there are some substantial problems with that explanation. The existence of prescience is highly disputed. While there are many people who believe in, or even claim to have, this ability, there is no scientific theory that would explain how such an ability could exist. Many people who claim to have this ability have been shown to be frauds or con artists. The evidence from rigorously controlled scientific tests of this ability is weak at best. Some tests show results that are indistinguishable from random guessing. Some tests show results that are correct slightly more often than random guessing would predict. Some tests show results that are incorrect slightly more often than random guessing. It is not the type of ability that you would want to rely on to save your life. Fortunately for me, there are other possible explanations for what I experienced on the Octopus. Pure coincidence is one possible explanation. I can’t rule that out entirely, but it appears to be pretty improbable. There are much more likely explanations available. For example, I could have been thinking about the risk of injury or death because I was in a ride that is deliberately designed to stimulate the fear of injury or death. There have undoubtedly been many people who have had thoughts similar to mine during a carnival ride. For most of those people, the door never opened, and they quickly forgot that they had such a concern. There have most likely been a large number of incorrect predictions of this type. The fact that the door flew open during my ride does not mean that my concerns were based on direct knowledge of future events. We don’t say that a person who wears a seat belt and gets in an accident is more prescient on that occasion than he or she was on the many occasions the seat belt was worn and there was no accident. There is another possible factor that may help explain what happened to me. I may have received information through one of my normal senses that triggered my concern. Perhaps I saw something wrong with the door, or heard an unusual noise which made me think that the door might fly open. I do not have any specific memory of this happening, but in the excitement of the subsequent events, I could easily have forgotten about it. The sensory input that triggered my concern may not even have risen to a conscious level in the first place. There is a limited sense in which we are all prescient. We all have the ability to imagine how future events could play out, based on our sensory input, our prior life experiences and our ability to understand cause and effect. Often we get it right, perhaps more often than we may realize. If I step on the brake, I can avoid hitting that car. If I run over there, I can catch that baseball. In this limited sense of the word, I was prescient. I imagined a possible bad future event, and took steps to avoid the consequences. I don’t feel any need to pretend that I benefited from a supernatural talent. Our brains give all of us some entirely natural abilities that I think are truly super. I’m pretty grateful that they do. Kevin Morford is a political activist and an attorney in private practice in the Anchorage area. He can be reached at kmorford@insurgent49.com. |
-
Columnists -
- column archive -
October 27, 2006 October 20, 2006 October 13, 2006 October 6, 2006 September 29, 2006 September 22, 2006 September 15, 2006 September 8, 2006 September 1, 2006 August 25, 2006 August 18, 2006 August 11, 2006 August 4, 2006 July 28, 2006 July 21, 2006 July 14, 2006 June 30, 2006 June 23, 2006 June 16, 2006 June 9, 2006 June 2, 2006 May 26, 2006 May 12, 2006 May 5, 2006 April 28, 2006 April 21, 2006 April 14, 2006 April 7, 2006 March 31, 2006 March 24, 2006 March 17, 2006 March 3, 2006 February 24, 2006 February 17, 2006 February 10, 2006 February 3, 2006 January 27, 2006 January 20, 2006 January 13, 2006 January 6, 2006 December 30, 2005 December 23, 2005 December 16, 2005 December 10, 2005 December 2, 2005 November 25, 2005 November 18, 2005 November 11, 2005 November 4, 2005 October 28, 2005 October 21, 2005 October 14, 2005 October 7, 2005 September 30, 2005 September 23, 2005 September 16, 2005 September 9, 2005 September 2, 2005 August 26, 2005 August 19, 2005 August 12, 2005 August 5, 2005 July 29, 2005 July 22, 2005 July 15, 2005 July 8, 2005 July 1, 2005 - also by this writer - Borrow And Spend Republicans Judicial Independence Special Interest Trade Agreements Knee Jerks Unsure Insurance Flat Tax Folly Law and Disorder Spies Among Us Why Tort Reform Is Bad For The Economy |
|||||||
| Copyright
2005
Insurgent Media. All Rights
Reserved. in-sur-gent (in sur'jent), n. 1. a member of a group which revolts against the policies of its leadership. |
||||||||