| updated weekly |
home - submissions - donate - message board - events - links - contact us - archive |
| September 8, 2006 The Bramble Bush by Kevin Morford A Tale of Two Oil Companies
It is the best of times; it is the worst of times. Oil companies across the globe are profiting mightily from the current high price of oil. The state government in Alaska isn’t doing too shabbily either. While that price will fluctuate over time, the reality of peak oil is likely to keep the price well above its historical base lines for the indefinite future. Yet while the oil companies and the oil owners prosper, others suffer real privations because of the high cost of oil. One of the ironies of living in an oil colony like Alaska is that we can see oil billionaires and oil paupers right next to each other in the same state. The Alaskans who suffer the most from high oil prices are the rural residents, mostly Alaska Natives, who support themselves with a subsistence lifestyle. They typically have far lower levels of cash income than urban residents do, but they still need to heat their houses. The cost of fuel oil in the bush is far higher than the cost of the same fuel in Anchorage. With all of the hundreds of billions of dollars that they have extracted from the ground in Alaska, you might think that the oil companies would be willing to help the rural subsistence residents with the price of heating oil. Now, one oil company is stepping up to do just that, with a program to give away 1.2 million gallons of free heating oil to low income residents of rural Alaska. It is not Exxon, which spilled millions of gallons of crude oil in Prince William Sound, and has spent millions of dollars fighting the resulting judgment against it with repeated appeals. Exxon doesn’t care about Alaskans. It is not BP, which ignored repeated warnings about its failing infrastructure on the north slope, and which fought tooth and nail this year to avoid a tax on its gross production of oil so that it could write off the cost of rebuilding the corroded pipes it had neglected for so many years. Don’t expect that kind of assistance from BP. No, the oil company that is stepping up to help rural residents in Alaska is Citgo, which has never extracted even a single barrel of oil from Alaska. Citgo, for those who don’t know, is a state run oil company from Venezuela. Citgo is not just helping rural residents of Alaska. It has been providing assistance with fuel costs to low income people in many parts of the United States and in many other places around the world. The Bush administration hates the government of Venezuela. It hates it so much that it supported a military coup against Venezuela’s President Hugo Chavez a few years ago. Since failure of that coup, it has poured money into support for his political opponents. The Bush administration calls Chavez a “dictator.” It is a baseless accusation, because Chavez has won several free elections, and independent polls show that he enjoys strong support from about 60 percent of the population of his country. His support comes from the fact that he is actually helping the poor people of Venezuela. He has wiped out illiteracy with free educational programs. He has built medical clinics all over the country, which provide basic health care free of charge. And he has given away millions of gallons of oil to low income people around the world. Not exactly standard fare for a dictator. The behavior of Citgo, compared with the very different behavior of the oil companies that operate in Alaska, illustrates an important point. Corporations can be made into forces for social justice if they are properly motivated. Now, I don’t claim that Citgo is perfect. But the world would be a much better place if corporations like Exxon and BP were required to devote more resources to the promotion of social justice. Kevin Morford is a political activist and an attorney in private practice in the Anchorage area. He can be reached at kmorford@insurgent49.com. |
-
Columnists -
- column archive -
September 1, 2006 August 25, 2006 August 18, 2006 August 11, 2006 August 4, 2006 July 28, 2006 July 21, 2006 July 14, 2006 June 30, 2006 June 23, 2006 June 16, 2006 June 9, 2006 June 2, 2006 May 26, 2006 May 12, 2006 May 5, 2006 April 28, 2006 April 21, 2006 April 14, 2006 April 7, 2006 March 31, 2006 March 24, 2006 March 17, 2006 March 3, 2006 February 24, 2006 February 17, 2006 February 10, 2006 February 3, 2006 January 27, 2006 January 20, 2006 January 13, 2006 January 6, 2006 December 30, 2005 December 23, 2005 December 16, 2005 December 10, 2005 December 2, 2005 November 25, 2005 November 18, 2005 November 11, 2005 November 4, 2005 October 28, 2005 October 21, 2005 October 14, 2005 October 7, 2005 September 30, 2005 September 23, 2005 September 16, 2005 September 9, 2005 September 2, 2005 August 26, 2005 August 19, 2005 August 12, 2005 August 5, 2005 July 29, 2005 July 22, 2005 July 15, 2005 July 8, 2005 July 1, 2005 - also by this writer - Borrow And Spend Republicans Judicial Independence Special Interest Trade Agreements Knee Jerks Unsure Insurance Flat Tax Folly Law and Disorder Spies Among Us Why Tort Reform Is Bad For The Economy |
|||||||
| Copyright
2005
Insurgent Media. All Rights
Reserved. in-sur-gent (in sur'jent), n. 1. a member of a group which revolts against the policies of its leadership. |
||||||||