| updated weekly |
home - submissions - donate - message board - events - links - contact us - archive |
| July 14, 2006 The Bramble Bush by Kevin Morford Loan
Shark Tax Cuts
George Bush promotes his so-called tax cuts by saying that he is just giving the people their own money back. It is the pretty facade he puts on a very ugly policy. A recent study jointly released by the Alaska Center for Public Policy and Citizens for Tax Justice tears down the facade and reveals the true impact of the so called "tax cuts" on Alaskans. You can read more about the study at acpp.info/blog and at www.ctj.org/pdf/debtak.pdf. We are living in a time of huge budget deficits, so every dime of the Bush tax cuts adds to the national debt. As a result, the so-called tax cuts do not eliminate any aggregate tax burdens. Instead, they simply defer them to a later time when the debt must be repaid. It is like raiding your child’s college fund to have a little spending money for yourself today. Our children will end up paying for those tax cuts. I previously wrote about this issue in my article of June 24, 2005, and in my column of June 23, 2006. The new study, however, shows that the tax cuts do far more than simply defer the taxes to a later time. For example, it shows that for 99 percent of Alaskans, the-so called tax cuts actually increase the future debt burden that must be repaid by more than three fold. In other words, on average if they get a tax cut of $1,000 today, they will end up paying over $3,000 in taxes in the future as a result of that tax cut. This is because of interest and other charges incurred in servicing the debt. So it is not really a tax cut at all. The government is essentially loaning the money to you at a high rate of interest. Not only is there no truth in lending disclosure for that loan, but you also can’t even refuse the loan. Sure, you can decline to take the money, but if you do, your future tax debt burden will still go up to help repay the loans that have been made to other people. George Bush isn’t giving you back your own money ... he’s a loan shark. Here is another very interesting fact disclosed by this study. For the top one percent of income recipients in Alaska, the tax break actually does save them money. Those are folks who received at least $765,700 in income per year. In this elite category, an average tax cut of $51,130 per family member will only cost them about $34,139 in increased future tax debt burden. With 99 percent of Alaskans having an increased tax burden, and one percent having a reduced tax burden, the so-called tax cuts can only be seen as a program to redistribute wealth from the poor and middle classes to the rich. You probably already know who fares the worst under these so-called tax cuts. It is the bottom 20 percent of income earners according to the study. They get an average tax cut of $540, and an average increase in their future tax debt burden of $7,373, for a net loss of $6,833 per person. This is a future tax debt burden more than 13 times greater than their tax cut. But that is not any real surprise. Loan sharks always prey on the weak and powerless. Kevin Morford is a political activist and an attorney in private practice in the Anchorage area. He can be reached at kmorford@insurgent49.com. |
-
Columnists -
- column archive -
June 30, 2006 June 23, 2006 June 16, 2006 June 9, 2006 June 2, 2006 May 26, 2006 May 12, 2006 May 5, 2006 April 28, 2006 April 21, 2006 April 14, 2006 April 7, 2006 March 31, 2006 March 24, 2006 March 17, 2006 March 3, 2006 February 24, 2006 February 17, 2006 February 10, 2006 February 3, 2006 January 27, 2006 January 20, 2006 January 13, 2006 January 6, 2006 December 30, 2005 December 23, 2005 December 16, 2005 December 10, 2005 December 2, 2005 November 25, 2005 November 18, 2005 November 11, 2005 November 4, 2005 October 28, 2005 October 21, 2005 October 14, 2005 October 7, 2005 September 30, 2005 September 23, 2005 September 16, 2005 September 9, 2005 September 2, 2005 August 26, 2005 August 19, 2005 August 12, 2005 August 5, 2005 July 29, 2005 July 22, 2005 July 15, 2005 July 8, 2005 July 1, 2005 - also by this writer - Borrow And Spend Republicans Judicial Independence Special Interest Trade Agreements Knee Jerks Unsure Insurance Flat Tax Folly Law and Disorder Spies Among Us Why Tort Reform Is Bad For The Economy |
|||||||
| Copyright
2005
Insurgent Media. All Rights
Reserved. in-sur-gent (in sur'jent), n. 1. a member of a group which revolts against the policies of its leadership. |
||||||||