July 8, 2005
The
Bramble Bush
by Kevin Morford
Diamonds are a Monopolist’s
Best Friend
There seems to be
something about diamonds which leads to monopolistic business
practices. The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly held that baseball is
a sport
and not a business, and therefore is not subject to federal antitrust
laws.
That is outrageous enough, and may be the subject of a future column,
but today
I want to look at some of the business practices surrounding the other
type of
diamond, crystallized carbon.
This subject comes up because De Beers has
recently opened its first retail
shop in the United States. De Beers is the cartel which controls
approximately
two thirds of the uncut natural diamonds in the world. By artificially
restricting the supply of diamonds, and by its skillful use of
advertising,
political contributions, graft, and other unsavory (and sometimes
illegal)
practices, De Beers has managed to maintain an artificially high price
for
diamonds for well over a century now.
Prior to 1870, diamonds were genuinely rare.
In that year, however, huge
diamond "pipes" were discovered in South Africa, and the market was
suddenly flooded with large quantities of diamonds. The wealthy British
investors in the mines quickly realized that the price of diamonds
would plunge
drastically, because the price depended almost entirely on scarcity.
The owners
of the diamond mines decided to combine their interests into a single
entity
that could control production and perpetuate the myth that diamonds
were still
scarce and valuable. They merged their separate interests into De Beers
Consolidated Mines, Ltd., which was incorporated in South Africa. De
Beers then
took over all aspects of the world diamond trade. At its height, it
owned or
controlled all the diamond mines in southern Africa, and also owned
diamond
trading companies in England, Portugal, Israel, Belgium, Holland and
Switzerland. It has artificially maintained a high price for diamonds
by
strictly limiting the number of new diamonds which reach the market
each year,
and by manipulating public policy and perceptions around the world. The
number of diamonds released for sale each year is far
smaller than the number which are mined. As a result, De Beers has a
huge
inventory of cut and uncut diamonds which it is holding in its vaults,
and off
the market.
Despite its huge success in keeping the price
of diamonds high, there are some
fundamental problems with the idea that the prices will remain high in
the
future. First, gem diamonds do not get used up, so with very few
exceptions,
every diamond that has been cut into a gem since the beginning of time
still
exists today. The supply keeps getting larger and larger. It is
conservatively
estimated that the public holds more than five hundred million carats
of gem
diamonds. That is more than fifty times the amount of gem diamonds
produced by
De Beers in one year. If even a small percentage of diamond owners were
to put
their diamonds on the market, the price would plunge drastically.
Another problem threatening the high price of diamonds is the
increasing
availability of real but artificially created diamonds. The technology
is
improving, and the prices of artificial diamonds are coming down. Only
a
sophisticated lab can tell the difference between a natural and an
artificial
diamond. The availability of these indistinguishable alternatives,
which are not controlled by De Beers, exerts downward pressure on
the price of natural diamonds.
Many people are attracted to diamonds because
they believe that they can sell
the diamond for the same price they paid for it. Most diamond retailers
will
not agree to buy their own diamonds back from their customers, and of
those who
will, many will only do so at a price which is discounted by fifty
percent or
more. Businesses do exist which specialize in purchasing diamonds from
retail customers, but the customers are
often shocked to learn that they can only get back one half or even
less of the
price they paid at retail. Natural diamonds are not all created equal,
and even
certified appraisers often disagree about the qualify of a given stone,
and
this can also affect the price. Most diamond retailers are dependant on
De
Beers for their inventory, and also benefit from the high prices of
diamonds.
The difficulty of selling back your diamonds is intended to help keep
large
numbers of people from selling their diamonds, and destroying the
existing high
retail prices.
Another important aspect of the diamond trade
is blood diamonds, the stones
which are produced, sometimes with slave labor, in war zones like
Liberia and
Sierra Leone. Because of the success of the De Beers cartel, diamonds
are very
valuable in today’s market. This creates a strong incentive for
local war lords
to fight over the control of diamond mines. Millions of people have
suffered
the devastating effects of war in these regions, including starvation,
diseases, maiming, slavery, rape and death.
The current international agreement for
dealing with blood diamonds is called
the Kimberly Process, and it calls for diamonds from non-war zones (De
Beers
controlled mines) to be marketed with certificates of origin, and for
diamonds
without certificates to be excluded from international trade. The
Kimberly
Process is doomed to fail, and is failing. Blood diamonds are still
routinely reaching international markets, and
the diamond wars continue to rage. The problem is that the Kimberly
Process is
primarily designed to help bolster the De Beers cartel, by eliminating
from the
market those diamonds which De Beers does not control. This helps to
keep the price
of diamonds high, and fuels the incentive for the diamond wars.
International
boycotts have never been able to eliminate a black market in high value
goods,
whether it be Saddam Hussein’s oil, or African ivory, or grizzly
bear gall
bladders. The Kimberly Process does far more to protect De Beers than
it does
to eliminate the diamond wars.
To attack the problem of blood diamonds at its
source, it is necessary to break
up the De Beers cartel. It should be broken up into a bunch of smaller
companies, each with a proportionate share of diamond mines and hoarded
diamonds, and each required to compete with the others in a competitive
market.
This could be done through enforcement of antitrust laws in Europe and
South
Africa. The price of diamonds on the international market would drop
precipitously, and the profit motive for the
diamond wars would drop along with it. Instead of protecting the De
Beers
cartel, we would force the diamond producers into real competition, and
suck
the fuel out of the diamond wars at the same time.
Kevin Morford is a political
activist and an attorney in private practice in the Anchorage
area. He can be reached at kmorford@insurgent49.com.
|
-
Columnists -
|