| updated weekly |
home - submissions - donate - message board - events - links - contact us - archive |
| May 5, 2006 The Bramble Bush by Kevin Morford Pavlov’s
Demons
Anyone who wishes to develop a truly independent view of the world must learn to recognize and adopt useful ideas from wherever they find them, even if the source of those ideas also holds other ideas which are not accepted. The mind police often try to engage in wholesale demonization of certain sources of information, so that the public will reject every idea that comes from a forbidden source without examining the individual ideas on a case-by-case basis. Once the desired prejudice has taken hold, many people will automatically reject all ideas that come from the forbidden source. The classic example of this is the demonization of communism/Marxism/socialism. See, there are already readers who are turning off their minds, just from my use of those words, even before they find out what I am going to say about this topic. The demonization relating to those topics runs very deep indeed. For those who have been inculcated with the desired mind-set, it works just like classical conditioning worked for Pavlov’s dogs. Say a forbidden word like “Marxism,” and the conditioned subject starts slathering at the mouth. We have seen a recent example of an attempt to use this conditioned response here in Alaska. An oil industry front group called “Alaska’s Future” ran an ad purporting to quote Karl Marx as saying that the only way to kill capitalism is “taxes, taxes, taxes.” The oil industry was apparently hoping that the public’s Pavlovian response to Karl Marx would help them avoid higher taxes on their current record high windfall profits. The effort seems to have backfired to some extent, because Marx never said any such thing, and that fact has now been widely publicized. But if Marx had made the inane remark that was attributed to him, the ad would probably have been a significant help to the oil industry. It might end up being a help anyway. No single source of ideas is completely devoid of the truth, any more than any single source of ideas has a lock on the complete truth. If you want to find the truth, you need to look at ideas on their merits, and not just blindly screen out all ideas that come from a forbidden source. I have some fundamental criticisms of the ideas of Karl Marx, but I also recognize that there are some extremely powerful and useful ideas in his writings. One of my favorite analytical tools from Marx was paraphrased by Watergate deep throat W. Mark Felt, when he advised reporter Bob Woodward to “follow the money.” If you want to find out who is responsible for a particular action, you need to find out who benefits from it financially. This is an important tool in contemporary Marxist analysis, and arises out of Marx’s philosophy based on historical materialism. As the second in command at the FBI, Mr. Felt was certainly not a Marxist, but he did recognized the value of that analytical tool. In fact, law enforcement agencies around the world put a great deal of effort into tracing cash flows and money laundering by various targets of their investigations. Those efforts are a testament to the power and utility of the very Marxist idea that financial relationships explain a great deal about human behavior. Demonization and name-calling are devices used to control the spread of ideas. Many people allow themselves to be manipulated by those techniques, and even internalize wholesale prejudices into their belief systems. Those who wish to reach their own conclusions, instead of being manipulated by others, need to learn to look at the merits of ideas, and not just at the labels that have been applied to them. It is not always easy to do, but I prefer to reject Pavlov’s demons, and make use of good ideas from wherever I find them. Kevin Morford is a political activist and an attorney in private practice in the Anchorage area. He can be reached at kmorford@insurgent49.com. |
-
Columnists -
- column archive -
April 28, 2006 April 21, 2006 April 14, 2006 April 7, 2006 March 31, 2006 March 24, 2006 March 17, 2006 March 3, 2006 February 24, 2006 February 17, 2006 February 10, 2006 February 3, 2006 January 27, 2006 January 20, 2006 January 13, 2006 January 6, 2006 December 30, 2005 December 23, 2005 December 16, 2005 December 10, 2005 December 2, 2005 November 25, 2005 November 18, 2005 November 11, 2005 November 4, 2005 October 28, 2005 October 21, 2005 October 14, 2005 October 7, 2005 September 30, 2005 September 23, 2005 September 16, 2005 September 9, 2005 September 2, 2005 August 26, 2005 August 19, 2005 August 12, 2005 August 5, 2005 July 29, 2005 July 22, 2005 July 15, 2005 July 8, 2005 July 1, 2005 - also by this writer - Borrow And Spend Republicans Judicial Independence Special Interest Trade Agreements Knee Jerks Unsure Insurance Flat Tax Folly Law and Disorder Spies Among Us Why Tort Reform Is Bad For The Economy |
||||||
| Copyright
2005
Insurgent Media. All Rights
Reserved. in-sur-gent (in sur'jent), n. 1. a member of a group which revolts against the policies of its leadership. |
|||||||