insurgent49
  updated weekly
home - submissions - donatemessage board links - contact us - archive
April 17, 2007
The Bramble Bush
by Kevin Morford, insurgent49

The Plutocratic Agenda

     The political pendulum does not move with the regular precision of Focault’s pendulum, but it does swing back and forth. In the United States, the two most recent major changes in political direction were marked by the administrations of Franklin D. Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan. It is possible that the administration of George W. Bush will mark the end of the Reagan swing, and that the next administration will mark the beginning of a new political direction. But that depends on whether the voters elect representatives who will implement that change.

     Before FDR, the plutocrats were firmly in control. They were able to prevent most government programs which would have regulated or broken up their business interests. They were also able to violently suppress labor-organizing efforts, and to maintain a large pool of unemployed workers. This helped hold their labor costs (wages) down. They also made sure that there was no governmental social safety net for the poor.

     FDR changed that, and the plutocrats hated him for it. FDR passed legislation to regulate economic activities, break up monopolies, allow labor to organize, and create a government funded social safety net. In one form or another, government support for these programs lasted until the election of Reagan. These programs swelled the size of the American middle class, and improved the quality of life for many people.

     Starting with the Reagan administration and continuing to the present, the government stopped enforcing antitrust laws and began deregulating economic activities. The government made it possible for employers to start de-unionizing their workplaces. The government social safety net has also been dismantled piece by piece. They are still working to get rid of Social Security.

     A big part of the post-Reagan agenda of the plutocrats has been the special interest trade treaties that have been promoted as “free trade” agreements. I previously wrote here about that issue. Those treaties are part of a conscious effort to dismantle the middle class created by FDR, and that effort has been working very successfully.

     Economic data shows that there has been a huge redistribution of wealth since the election of Reagan, shifting from the middle and lower classes to the very wealthy. Even among the top ten percent of richest Americans, wealth has been dramatically redistributed upward to the richest one percent.

     What is happening is that the United States is changing into a third world country. Instead of retaining our status as a developed nation where large numbers of citizens share in the wealth, such as is found in almost every developed nation, we are transforming into a banana republic where a few wealthy families control almost everything, and large numbers of people live in abject squalor. The transformation is not complete, but we are well on our way.

     If this transition is successfully carried out, everyone will be much worse off. It is obvious why the people who have been reduced to penury will be worse off. But even the lives of the plutocrats will be degraded. Sure, they will have a little more money than they already do, but that money will not provide a better life for them.

     They will be living in a country where slums, pollution, crime, squalor and disease are rampant. Global warming will affect everyone. Both the natural environment and the human world will be degraded. Like the oligarchs in third world countries everywhere, they will be surrounded by the festering sickness of the society that they have created. They will only find beauty behind the razor wire walls of their private estates. They will become prisoners of their own avarice and greed. Yet they are too shortsighted to foresee the consequences of their ambitions.

     Many Americans support the plutocratic agenda because they hope that someday they too will become plutocrats. What they fail to realize is that even in the extremely unlikely event that they were to join those rarified ranks, the policies presently being followed will make their lives worse, and not better. Gold is a cold comfort when misery and squalor surround you.

     The political pendulum will change direction sooner or later. The question is whether the change will take place in time for those of us alive today to enjoy a better society. The elections in 2008 will play an important role in answering that question. It is up to us to get out and support and vote for candidates who reject the plutocratic agenda.







      Kevin Morford is a political activist and an attorney in private practice in the Anchorage area.  He can be reached at kmorford@insurgent49.com.

     'The Bramble Bush. appears on insurgent49.com every Tuesday.

- Columnists -

Editor's Desk
by Aaron Selbig

Rank and File
by Nova Stubbs

Red Alert
by Soren Wuerth



Alaskan In Exile
by Neil Zawicki

The
Bramble Bush
by Kevin Morford


The Tao

of Waitressing
by Lindsay Luckey








- column archive -

April 10, 2007

April 3, 2007

March 27, 2007

March 20, 2007

March 13, 2007

March 6, 2007

February 27, 2007

February 20, 2007

February 13, 2007

February 6, 2007

January 30, 2007

January 23, 2007

January 16, 2007

January 9, 2007

January 2, 2007

December 26, 2006

December 19, 2006

December 12, 2006

December 5, 2006

November 28, 2006

November 22, 2006

November 10, 2006

November 3, 2006

October 27, 2006

October 20, 2006

October 13, 2006

October 6, 2006

September 29, 2006

September 22, 2006

September 15, 2006

September 8, 2006

September 1, 2006

August 25, 2006

August 18, 2006

August 11, 2006

August 4, 2006

July 28, 2006

July 21, 2006

July 14, 2006

June 30, 2006

June 23, 2006

June 16, 2006

June 9, 2006

June 2, 2006

May 26, 2006

May 12, 2006

May 5, 2006

April 28, 2006

April 21, 2006

April 14, 2006

April 7, 2006

March 31, 2006

March 24, 2006

March 17, 2006

March 3, 2006

February 24, 2006

February 17, 2006

February 10, 2006

February 3, 2006

January 27, 2006

January 20, 2006

January 13, 2006

January 6, 2006

December 30, 2005

December 23, 2005

December 16, 2005

December 10, 2005

December 2, 2005

November 25, 2005

November 18, 2005

November 11, 2005

November 4, 2005

October 28, 2005

October 21, 2005

October 14, 2005

October 7, 2005

September 30, 2005

September 23, 2005

September 16, 2005

September 9, 2005

September 2, 2005

August 26, 2005

August 19, 2005

August 12, 2005

August 5, 2005

July 29, 2005

July 22, 2005

July 15, 2005

July 8, 2005

July 1, 2005



- also by this writer -

Borrow And Spend Republicans

Judicial Independence

Special Interest Trade Agreements

Knee Jerks

Unsure Insurance

Flat Tax Folly

Law and Disorder


Spies Among Us

Why Tort Reform Is Bad For The Economy



Copyright 2005-2007 Insurgent Media Alaska. All Rights Reserved.
in-sur-gent (in sur'jent), n. 1. a member of a group which revolts against the policies of its leadership.