insurgent49
  updated weekly
home - submissions - donatemessage board - events - links - contact us - archive
January 2, 2007
The Bramble Bush
by Kevin Morford

Milestones and Millstones

     I’m sure you have heard that former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein was executed at dawn, on Saturday, December 30, 2006. In a statement issued by a spokesman while President Bush was asleep, Bush said that the execution of Saddam Hussein “is an important milestone on Iraq’s course to becoming a democracy ... ”

     I must have been asleep that day in my political science courses. You know … the day when they taught us that executing people is a hallmark of a democracy. I attended my classes without fail, yet I have no recollection of that lesson having been taught.

     I do remember the professors teaching us that democracy is a system of government which gives the people of a nation the ability to govern themselves, but that is not what has happened in Iraq regarding the execution of Saddam Hussein.

     What happened is that after the invasion of Iraq, U.S. forces acquired custody of Saddam Hussein, and retained control over him right up until the hour of his execution? George Bush likes to kill people, and Saddam Hussein is the man who tried to kill his daddy.

     George Bush was determined to see Saddam Hussein executed. During his trial U.S. forces would escort Saddam Hussein to and from the courtroom, and were responsible for his physical control and security at all times.

     To me, that does not exactly sound like the people of Iraq governing themselves. It sounds like the government of the United States deciding what would happen, when and where. Sure, the Iraqis may have conducted the actual execution, but they were only allowed to do so at the last hour, after the United States said it was OK. This is supposed to be the important milestone on the road to democracy? I don’t think so.

     We all know what is really going on. I previously wrote here about the fact that George Bush says the exact opposite of what he really means. The same thing applies to this most recent statement. George Bush knows perfectly well that Iraq is rapidly losing its chances to become a democracy, and that the execution of Saddam Hussein is just going to further fuel the flames of civil war.

     But those facts are not helpful to George Bush’s own political agenda. So he just lies, and says that the execution is evidence of progress toward democracy.

     Far from being a milestone, the execution of Saddam Hussein is a millstone that will hinder efforts to build a just and sustainable government in Iraq. It creates a martyr for the Sunnis. It also deprives the Shiites and Kurds of the chance to confront Saddam Hussein regarding his other crimes.

     The execution of Saddam Hussein was an act of violent revenge, and will just reinforce the idea that violent revenge is a good way to deal with past wrongs.

     Iraq is a society that is now riven with hatred, suspicion and a history of past wrongs among many different groups of people. In order to build a new and functional society, they will need to learn forgiveness and reconciliation.  The execution of Saddam Hussein is a millstone that makes that outcome much less likely.






      Kevin Morford is a political activist and an attorney in private practice in the Anchorage area.  He can be reached at kmorford@insurgent49.com.

     'The Bramble Bush. appears on insurgent49.com every Tuesday.

- Columnists -

Editor's Desk
by Aaron Selbig

Rank and File
by Nova Stubbs

Red Alert
by Soren Wuerth



Alaskan In Exile
by Neil Zawicki

The
Bramble Bush
by Kevin Morford


The Tao

of Waitressing
by Lindsay Luckey








- column archive -

December 26, 2006

December 19, 2006

December 12, 2006

December 5, 2006

November 28, 2006

November 22, 2006

November 10, 2006

November 3, 2006

October 27, 2006

October 20, 2006

October 13, 2006

October 6, 2006

September 29, 2006

September 22, 2006

September 15, 2006

September 8, 2006

September 1, 2006

August 25, 2006

August 18, 2006

August 11, 2006

August 4, 2006

July 28, 2006

July 21, 2006

July 14, 2006

June 30, 2006

June 23, 2006

June 16, 2006

June 9, 2006

June 2, 2006

May 26, 2006

May 12, 2006

May 5, 2006

April 28, 2006

April 21, 2006

April 14, 2006

April 7, 2006

March 31, 2006

March 24, 2006

March 17, 2006

March 3, 2006

February 24, 2006

February 17, 2006

February 10, 2006

February 3, 2006

January 27, 2006

January 20, 2006

January 13, 2006

January 6, 2006

December 30, 2005

December 23, 2005

December 16, 2005

December 10, 2005

December 2, 2005

November 25, 2005

November 18, 2005

November 11, 2005

November 4, 2005

October 28, 2005

October 21, 2005

October 14, 2005

October 7, 2005

September 30, 2005

September 23, 2005

September 16, 2005

September 9, 2005

September 2, 2005

August 26, 2005

August 19, 2005

August 12, 2005

August 5, 2005

July 29, 2005

July 22, 2005

July 15, 2005

July 8, 2005

July 1, 2005



- also by this writer -

Borrow And Spend Republicans

Judicial Independence

Special Interest Trade Agreements

Knee Jerks

Unsure Insurance

Flat Tax Folly

Law and Disorder


Spies Among Us

Why Tort Reform Is Bad For The Economy



Copyright 2005 Insurgent Media. All Rights Reserved.
in-sur-gent (in sur'jent), n. 1. a member of a group which revolts against the policies of its leadership.