| updated weekly |
home - contribute - donate - message board - events - links - contact us - archive |
| January 25, 2007 Editor’s Desk by Aaron Selbig, insurgent49 Recently, President Bush sat down for an interview with Jim Lehrer from PBS. In response to a question about the fact that, other than members of the military, Americans have not been asked to sacrifice anything in the Iraq War, Bush had this to say, "Well, you know, I ... I think a lot of people are in this fight. I mean, they ... they sacrifice peace of mind when they see the terrible images of violence on TV every night." Watching TV? Are you serious, Mr. President? That's it? Is he equating the Iraq War with a particularly edgy episode of CSI: Miami? The President's comments got me to thinking about the real wartime sacrifices (or lack thereof) that have been made by the American people. Honestly, just like Prsident Bush, I had a hard time thinking of any. There is one sacrifice, however, that most of us have made, and it was the subject of an 'Editor's Desk' in September of last year. Let's review: September 29, 2006 It’s been a secure week here at Insurgent Headquarters. In the days following the terrorist attacks of 9/11, President Bush gave a series of speeches to a stunned, newly at-war country, advising all of us that sacrifices would have to be made. But, honestly … what sacrifices have we made? Unless you are a member of the military or have a loved one fighting in the military, what have you sacrificed? The only thing that many Americans can concretely point to that has changed in this country since 9/11 is the frustrating, and sometimes humiliating, experience of getting through airport security. And even that has become a joke. Last week, the Transportation Security Administration partially reversed its ban on carrying liquids and gels onto airplanes. In the immediate aftermath of an uncovered terrorist plot in Europe to somehow use those liquids and gels to take down a plane, the TSA had banned them outright. These items included toothpaste, shampoo, hair care products, bottled water, some types of deodorant, and even baby formula. But don’t worry, America. Everything is all right now. You have the green light to carry toothpaste on the plane again, as long as it’s in a three-ounce or less “travel-size” tube and is placed inside a Ziploc baggie. Huh? Who makes these rules, anyway? TSA chief Kip Hawley calls the decision a “common sense approach”. The new regulations will still “maintain a high level of security at airports”, he says. The FBI tested various types of liquids and gels, apparently, and decided that it was impossible to blow up an airplane with anything less than three ounces of toothpaste … or hair gel … or shampoo … or whatever. Really? Are you sure? There’s no terrorist out there clever enough to figure out how to make a bomb with a standard stick of Right Guard? Well, that’s comforting. And why the travel-size tubes, anyway? Those goddamn things are expensive. Is this some kind of conspiracy to benefit a Bush crony in the travel-size toiletry industry? Does Mike Brown work for Colgate now? And as long as we’re talking conspiracy theory, what is happening to all of the extra bathroom supplies? At the security checkpoint in the Atlanta airport the day after the lifting of the ban, there was a bin of confiscated liquids and gels that was three feet deep. Is somebody making money off of this idiocy? Is the TSA supplementing its income by selling shampoo on the black market? And, by the way, whatever happened with nail clippers and cigarette lighters? I don’t get out of Alaska much, so I’m a little fuzzy on the rules here … are these items okay yet? Or is there still a danger of Al Qaeda hijacking an airplane with a nail file? Oh, forget it. I just can’t keep up with these wacky terrorists. Unfortunately, it seems that the government can’t either. While the TSA is busy confiscating toothpaste, an investigative reporter from the Seattle Times blew the lid off lackadaisical port security a few months ago by gaining access to secured areas in ports all up and down the West Coast with no ID and no questions asked. He hitchhiked with truck drivers who simply drove him to areas where he had access to thousands of containers destined for all corners of the nation. Good thing he didn’t have any hair gel. The Bush administration doesn’t really care all that much about real security, though. They care about fear. Fear has always been the best way to control populations and to mute political opposition, and that is exactly what they have been so successful at doing since 9/11. Every time the color-coded “terror threat level” goes up to orange or mauve or whatever, like it did when the airport gel ban went into effect, Americans are cowed just a little bit more. Every time there is a new method discovered of taking down an airplane, Americans are reminded of their cunning and relentless enemies. And every time we are forced to go through airport security, to take off our shoes and belts, to turn over our toothpaste and shampoo, to be treated simultaneously like terrorists and cattle, we are reminded that it is only our ever-watchful, vigilant government that stands between us and certain death. Feel secure yet? Aaron Selbig is an activist and media junkie who resides in an undisclosed location in downtown Anchorage. He is the winner of a 2006 Alaska Press Club award for Best Editorial Writing, host of KUDO 1080 AM's 'The Aaron Selbig Show' and a co-founder of Insurgent49. Aaron may be contacted at editor@insurgent49.com 'Editor's Desk' appears on insurgent49.com every Thursday. |
-
Columnists -
- column archive -
January 18, 2007 January 11, 2007 January 4, 2007 December 28, 2006 December 21, 2006 December 14, 2006 December 7, 2006 November 30, 2006 November 23, 2006 November 10, 2006 November 3, 2006 October 27, 2006 October 13, 2006 October 6, 2006 September 29, 2006 September 22, 2006 September 15, 2006 September 8, 2006 September 1, 2006 August 25, 2006 August 18, 2006 August 11, 2006 August 4, 2006 July 28, 2006 July 21, 2006 July 14, 2006 June 30, 2006 June 23, 2006 June 16, 2006 June 9, 2006 June 2, 2006 May 26, 2006 May 12, 2006 May 5, 2006 April 28, 2006 April 21, 2006 April 14, 2006 April 7, 2006 March 31, 2006 March 24, 2006 March 17, 2006 March 3, 2006 February 24, 2006 February 17, 2006 February 10, 2006 February 3, 2006 January 27, 2006 January 20, 2006 January 13, 2006 January 6, 2006 December 30, 2005 December 23, 2005 December 16, 2005 December 10, 2005 December 2, 2005 November 25, 2005 November 18, 2005 November 11, 2005 November 4, 2005 October 28, 2005 October 21, 2005 October 14, 2005 October 7, 2005 September 30, 2005 September 23, 2005 September 16, 2005 September 9, 2005 September 2, 2005 August 26, 2005 August 19, 2005 August 12, 2005 August 5, 2005 July 29, 2005 July 22, 2005 July 15, 2005 July 8, 2005 July 1, 2005 June 24, 2005 June 17, 2005 June 10, 2005 June 3, 2005 May 27, 2005 May 20, 2005 May 13, 2005 May 6, 2005 April 28, 2005 April 21, 2005 April 14, 2005 April 7, 2005 April 1, 2005 |
||||||||
| Copyright 2005
Insurgent Media.
All rights reserved. in-sur-gent (in sur'jent), n. 1. a member of a group which revolts against the policies of its leadership. |
|||||||||
